AI Safety
·IdenticAPI

AI Output Safety Checklist for Production Applications

A production checklist for AI output safety — moderation placement, rendering controls, escalation, logging, and testing.

Use this AI output safety checklist before shipping LLM features to production: screen every user-visible model completion server-side, route IdenticAPI verdicts to allow/review/block actions, render output with encoding or sanitization plus CSP, log moderation metadata safely, and regression-test synthetic unsafe payloads in CI.

Copy this list into your release process. Items assume AI Output Safety or equivalent output moderation — adjust tooling names to match your stack.

1. Threat model and scope

  • Document that model completions are untrusted until validated (LLM output as untrusted input)
  • List every surface where assistant text appears (web chat, email, tickets, push, PDF export)
  • Identify stored vs ephemeral outputs (stored XSS risk)
  • Include improper output handling in LLM risk register alongside prompt injection
  • Define audiences (consumer, B2B, internal) and content policies per audience

2. Moderation placement

  • Output moderation runs after LLM inference, before client delivery, storage, or tool side effects
  • Moderation executes server-side only — no production API keys in browser code
  • Streaming UIs buffer or gate — no raw token HTML insertion before final check (real-time chat)
  • RAG answers moderated as a whole; retrieved snippets moderated if shown directly
  • Input moderation considered separately (input vs output)

3. IdenticAPI integration

  • POST /api/v1/security/output-safety with body {"text":"..."} wired into chat/RAG path
  • Parse verdict (safe, suspicious, unsafe), risk, findings, reasons
  • Store request_id with app trace IDs for support
  • API key in secrets manager / environment — not in repo
  • Timeouts defined with documented fail-closed or degraded mode
  • Read AI Output Safety documentation
  • Validate sample outputs in AI Output Safety Checker during development

Example request:

curl -X POST https://www.identicapi.com/api/v1/security/output-safety \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer idapi_test_your_key_here" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{"text": "Completion to screen"}'

4. Verdict policy (block vs review vs allow)

  • Written policy mapping verdicts to actions (block vs review guide)
  • unsafe → block with static fallback — no echo of flagged text
  • suspicious → human review or cautious fallback — access-controlled queue
  • safe → deliver only after rendering controls (moderation ≠ sanitizer)
  • Fallback messages pre-approved by legal/support/comms
  • High-stakes domains (support, healthcare adjacent) define escalation SLAs (support bot architecture)

5. Safe rendering

  • Default UI renders plain text (encoded) — no unsanitized HTML
  • Markdown parsers disable raw HTML or sanitize output
  • HTML sanitizer uses strict tag/attribute allowlist (safe AI-generated HTML)
  • Block javascript:, inline event handlers, iframe/script unless explicitly required and sandboxed
  • Content-Security-Policy on pages displaying AI content (XSS prevention)
  • Re-sanitize or re-validate stored messages on read

6. Guardrails and complementary controls

  • Prompt injection screening on untrusted inputs where applicable
  • PII/secrets detection on logs and outputs if required by compliance
  • Tool/agent actions not driven by raw model strings — structured intents with authz
  • Evaluate Unified Guard if orchestrating multiple detectors (guardrails vs moderation)

7. Framework implementation

  • Next.js: Route Handlers / Server Actions moderate before response (Next.js guide)
  • Python: service layer moderates before JSON to clients (Python guide)
  • Non-HTTP workers (Celery, queues) moderate before marking jobs complete
  • Multiple clients share one policy module — avoid divergent rules

8. Logging and privacy

  • Log verdict, risk, categories, request_id — minimize full flagged body in production logs
  • Review queue access restricted to trained staff
  • Retention policy for blocked/suspicious content documented
  • Analytics pipelines do not leak moderated text to third parties without review

9. Testing and regression

  • CI tests: synthetic XSS strings, phishing phrasing, benign technical answers
  • Assert unsafe payloads never returned to test client
  • Assert moderation API failure triggers fail-closed path
  • Periodic manual review of sampled suspicious cases in staging/production
  • Re-test after model version upgrades or prompt template changes

Synthetic XSS cases to include:

<script>alert(1)</script>
<img src=x onerror=alert(1)>
[click](javascript:alert(1))

10. Operations and incident response

  • Runbook for moderation API outage (human-only mode vs read-only chat)
  • Alert on abnormal block rate spikes
  • Process for customer reports of harmful AI replies
  • Post-incident review updates checklist and test corpus
  • On-call knows where API status and docs live

11. Documentation and training

12. Pre-launch sign-off

  • Security review of output path complete
  • Product accepts false positive / false negative tradeoffs in writing
  • Legal/comms reviewed customer-facing fallback language
  • No marketing claims of "guaranteed safe AI output"
  • All checklist sections above have owners and dates
ResourceURL
AI Output Safety product/api/ai-output-safety
Documentation/docs/ai-output-safety
Interactive checker/tools/ai-output-safety-checker
Unified orchestration/api/unified-guard
API integration guide/blog/ai-content-moderation-api-guide

Limitations (read before sign-off)

Automated output safety reduces risk but does not eliminate it:

  • Verdicts indicate elevated risk, not certainty
  • Sanitizers and CSP require maintenance
  • Human review remains necessary for ambiguous suspicious content in high-trust products

Treat this checklist as a living document — update when you add new surfaces (mobile app, voice transcripts, exports) or new IdenticAPI capabilities.

When every item has an owner and evidence, you are in a stronger position to ship LLM features without improper output handling gaps.

Frequently asked questions

What is the minimum output safety requirement for production LLM apps?

Server-side output moderation on every user-visible completion, explicit verdict routing, safe rendering (encode or sanitize plus CSP for web), and fail-closed behavior when moderation is unavailable.

Does completing this checklist guarantee safe AI output?

No. The checklist reduces common failure modes; automated verdicts remain probabilistic. Maintain monitoring, incident response, and human review where appropriate.

How often should I re-run checklist items?

At initial launch, after major model or prompt changes, when adding new surfaces (mobile, exports, voice), and following any reported unsafe output incident.

What synthetic tests should CI include?

Script tags, img onerror handlers, javascript: Markdown links, phishing-style language, and benign technical answers. Assert unsafe cases never reach test clients and API failures trigger fallbacks.

Related reading